« Troublesome pairs: "less than" v. "fewer than" | Main | Book Review - E-mail: A Write It Well Guide »

Cutting unneeded words: pleonasms

I’ve mentioned pleonasms, the habit of using more words than necessary to express an idea, before. Here are a few particularly egregious examples that make me want to pour oatmeal in my ears:

“The car is red in color.” I suppose next you’ll tell me it was “large in size,” or “sleek in shape?” If you say something is red, blue, puce, or cerulean, there’s no need to add “in color.” Nothing can be red in size or shape, unless the person describing it did a little too much LDS back in the sixties, so leave in color out.

“The audience was few in number.”  Well, if you’re going to litter your speech with excess baggage like “few in number,” you shouldn’t be surprised by a sparse turnout. Just like red can only refer to color, few (and many) can only refer to something’s quantity.

Please, do everyone a favor and prune out verbal deadwood like this. 

Posted on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 at 07:13AM by Registered CommenterRoy Jacobsen in | Comments2 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

I come from and law enforcement background and have reviewed many reports with this kind of writing. I'm sure I've been guilty of it also.

I hope I haven't been doing it in my blog writing.

As always thanks for your posts.
December 16, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterRoy
On pleonasms: Loved your reference to "a little to much LDS back in the sixties".
Star Trek IV is one of my favorite movies.
After all, they did save the humpback whales.
December 17, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterKate

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>