Support Writing, Clear and Simple!

If this weblog has been helpful to you, please click the button below to make a secure credit card donation via PayPal.

Thanks!

Recommended Resources
sobbutton3.png
Fast & Free Delivery

Note: Writing, Clear and Simple does not necessarily approve, endorse, or recommend any of the products and services advertised here. Caveat emptor.

Disclaimer

If you came to Writing, Clear and Simple expecting grammatical and stylistic perfection, keep moving. Everyone makes mistakes, including your humble host (despite my best efforts). If you’re willing to deal with that, stick around and join the fun. And if you spot a writing faux pas here, feel free to bring it to my attention. You might even win some points.

Login
Powered by Squarespace
Search and Subscriptions
Call me!
1-888-MY-ETHER ext. 02099520
« Caveat emptor: I do not necessarily endorse the ads appearing here | Main | Poll: Should I start having polls? »
Monday
23Jan

Watch out for sound-alike words

The term for words that sound the same but have different meanings (and sometimes spellings) is homophone (click for a definition), which sounds an awful lot like homophobe, so you can think of them as sound-alikes if you like. (Homophone is from Latin and means "same sound.") Whichever you prefer, homophones or sound-alikes, be aware that they can sneak in past spell-checkers and twist the meaning of your writing, frustrate your readers, and make you look a bit (or a lot, depending on how often you mix them up) silly.

One of the most frequently abused sound-alike pairs is your/you’re, which I wrote about here. But I am continually surprised by the places these things sneak in. For example, I’ve been reading a book by a writer who has a powerful way with words and stories, published by a major publisher of Christian titles. I assume this particular book has gone through a few review cycles with an editor, and very likely a copy editor and a production editor. Several eyes have seen this book before it went into print. And yet I’ve found two glaring instances where they used a homophone rather than the word they really meant to use.

The first one was flare, and from the context of the sentence, which was talking about doing something "with flare," it was obvious that he meant to use flair.

Later in the book, the author spoke of something that another writer was "eluding to." However, eluding is something that the Roadrunner does, as in "The Roadrunner easily eluded Wile E. Coyote’s trap." The word the author wanted here was alluding, because writers quite often make indirect references to things.

OK, so maybe this seems like a nit-picky thing. I’m enjoying the book very much, and I understand what the writer is saying, so what’s the big deal? The big deal is that everytime you cause your reader to stumble over a word, even if it’s ever so slight, you lose something. It might be your readers’ momentum, as they stumble over the wrong word, reflect for a moment to figure out what you meant, and then go on. If this happens too frequently, your readers may lose patience with you and give up entirely. Most importantly, mistakes like this can reduce your credibility, a hard-to-gain commodity. Don’t squander your credibility on such trivial mistakes as homophone mixups.

Make friends with your dictionary. It doesn’t hurt to look up a word or two every now and then to ensure that it means what you think it means.

 


Create polls and vote for free. dPolls.com

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>